Epicure: a European epidemiological study of patients with an advanced or metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) having progressed to a platinum-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based systemic chemotherapy is considered the backbone for management of advanced urothelial carcinomas. However there is a lack of real world data on the use of such chemotherapy regimens, on patient profiles and on management after treatment failure. METHODS: Fifty-one randomly selected physicians from 4 European countries registered 218 consecutive patients in progression or relapse following a first platinum-based chemotherapy. Patient characteristics, tumor history and treatment regimens, as well as the considerations of physicians on the management of urothelial carcinoma were recorded. RESULTS: A systemic platinum-based regimen had been administered as the initial chemotherapy in 216 patients: 15 in the neoadjuvant setting, 61 in adjuvant therapy conditions, 137 in first-line advanced setting and 3 in other conditions. Of these patients, 76 (35 %) were initially considered as cisplatin-unfit, mainly because of renal impairment (52 patients). After platinum failure, renal impairment was observed in 44 % of patients, ECOG Performance Status ≥ 2 in 17 %, hemoglobinemia < 10 g/dL in 16 %, hepatic metastases in 13 %. 80 % of these patients received further anticancer therapy. Immediately after failure of adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy, most subsequent anticancer treatments were chemotherapy doublets (35/58), whereas after therapy failure in the advanced setting most patients receiving further anticancer drugs were treated with a single agent (80/114). After first progression to chemotherapy, treatment decisions were mainly driven by Performance Status and prior response to chemotherapy (>30 % patients). The most frequent all-settings second anticancer therapy regimen was vinflunine (70 % of single-agent and 42 % of all subsequent treatments), the main reasons evoked by physicians (>1 out of 4) being survival benefit, safety and phase III evidence. CONCLUSION: In this daily practice experience, a majority of patients with urothelial carcinoma previously treated with a platinum-based therapy received a second chemotherapy regimen, most often a single agent after an initial chemotherapy in the advanced setting and preferably a cytotoxic combination after a neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Performance Status and prior response to chemotherapy were the main drivers of further treatment decisions.

[Long-term use of an endovascular temperature catheter]. / Langzeitanwendung eines intravasalen Temperaturkatheters.

A patient suffering from severe cutaneous graft versus host disease (GvHD) developed generalized epidermolysis and refractory hypothermia. Due to the insufficient effect of traditional rewarming methods, an endovascular temperature catheter was placed via the femoral vein to achieve and maintain normothermia over a period of 31 days. This case shows that an endovascular temperature modulation device primarily made for short-term use may be safe and effective even over weeks and may offer an alternative to other rewarming methods in patients with severe epidermolysis and burns.

The use of drotrecogin alfa in severe falciparum malaria.

We report the case of a 55-year-old male European who became septic after he returned from a four-week holiday to Uganda. Soon after; he was diagnosed with severe falciparum malaria and developed multi-organ failure. Due to the worsening condition of the patient, drotrecogin alfa (activated) was started, soon after which the patient's condition significantly improved. He returned home on day 36 after admission, without neurologic sequelae. Looking at those few cases of severe forms of malaria where drotrecogin alfa (activated) was successfully used, it should at least be considered for administration in patients with severe falciparum malaria with disseminated intravascular coagulation and cerebral involvement who do not respond to or deteriorate during standard treatment.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anastrozole vs tamoxifen in adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer in the United Kingdom: the 5-year completed treatment analysis of the ATAC ('Arimidex', Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial.

Results from the completed treatment analysis of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen alone or in combination) trial indicated that anastrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in terms of efficacy and safety in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer. On the basis of these results, this study estimated the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole vs tamoxifen, from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). A Markov model was developed using the 5-year completed treatment analysis from the ATAC trial (ISRCTN18233230), as well as data obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Resource utilisation data and associated costs (2003-4 UK pound) were compiled from standard sources and expert opinion. Utility scores for a number of health states were obtained from a cross-sectional study of 26 representative patients using the standard gamble technique. The utility scores were then inserted into the model to obtain cost per quality adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Costs and benefits were discounted at recommended annual rates of the UK Treasury (3.5%). Modelled for 25 years, anastrozole, relative to generic tamoxifen, was estimated to result in 0.244 QALYs gained per patient at an additional cost of pound4315 per patient). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen was pound17 656 per QALY gained. There was a greater than 90% probability that the cost-effectiveness of anastrozole was below pound30 000 per QALY gained and of the order of 65% that it was below pound20 000 per QALY gained. The results were robust to all parameters tested in sensitivity analysis. Compared with commonly accepted thresholds, anastrozole is a cost-effective alternative to generic tamoxifen in adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with HR+ early breast cancer from the UK NHS perspective.

Comprehensive side-effect profile of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: long-term safety analysis of the ATAC trial.

BACKGROUND: The Arimidex (anastrozole), Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of anastrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. After an extended follow-up beyond the 5 years of treatment, we aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and risk-benefit indices of these compounds. METHODS: We analysed postmenopausal women (mean age 64 years [SD 9]) with localised breast cancer randomly assigned to anastrozole (n=3125) or tamoxifen (n=3116). Efficacy measures, including death and risk-benefit indices, were analysed by intention to treat. Safety analyses were based on treatment first received (n=3092 for anastrozole and n=3094 tamoxifen). We calculated a risk-benefit analysis using the two global indices for the Women's Health Initiative and for Disease-Free Survival and Serious Adverse Events. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN18233230. FINDINGS: At median follow-up of 68 months (range 1-93), treatment-related adverse events occurred significantly less often with anastrozole than with tamoxifen (1884 [61%] vs 2117 [68%]; p<0.0001), as did treatment-related serious adverse events (146 [5%] vs 277 [9%]; p<0.0001) and adverse events leading to withdrawal (344 [11%] vs 442 [14%]; p=0.0002). Patients given anastrozole had significantly fewer overall events for the Global Index of the Women's Health Initiative (744 [24%] vs 851 [27%]; hazard ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.94], p=0.001) and the Global Index of Disease-Free Survival and Serious Adverse Events (1453 [46%] vs 1594 [51%]; 0.88 [0.82-0.94]; p=0.0004). INTERPRETATION: Anastrozole is tolerated better than tamoxifen by postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer, and results in fewer serious adverse events. Furthermore, it has a more favourable overall risk-benefit profile and lower recurrence rate than tamoxifen.

Fulvestrant ('Faslodex') in pre-treated patients with advanced breast cancer: a single-centre experience.

Fulvestrant ('Faslodex') is a new oestrogen receptor (ER) antagonist with no agonist effects. This report describes the experience of a single centre including 126 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a fulvestrant Compassionate Use Programme. All patients had previously received endocrine treatment for early or ABC. Patients received fulvestrant as first- (n=7), second- (n=51), third- (n=50) or fourth-line endocrine therapy (n=18) for ABC (median duration of treatment: 4 months [range 3-27(+) months], follow-up: 13 months [range 1-38(+) months]). Twelve patients had partial responses (PR) and 43 patients experienced stable disease (SD) > or = 6 months (objective response rate: 9.5%; clinical benefit [CB] rate: 43.6%). Ten of 12 patients with a PR had HER2-negative tumours, and 9/12 had ER-positive and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive disease (two patients had unknown HER2 status and one had unknown ER and PgR status). Nine of the 18 patients with HER2-positive tumours experienced CB with fulvestrant. Although CB rates were similar when fulvestrant was given as first- to fourth-line endocrine treatment, the proportion of those experiencing CB who had a PR appeared to decrease when fulvestrant was used later in the sequence. Fulvestrant was well tolerated; six patients experienced adverse events (all grade I/II). These data demonstrate that fulvestrant is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for patients with ABC progressing on prior therapies.

Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years' adjuvant treatment for breast cancer.

The standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive localised breast cancer is 5 years of tamoxifen, but recurrences and side-effects restrict its usefulness. The aromatase inhibitor anastrozole was compared with tamoxifen for 5 years in 9366 postmenopausal women with localised breast cancer. After a median follow-up of 68 months, anastrozole significantly prolonged disease-free survival (575 events with anastrozole vs 651 with tamoxifen, hazard ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97, p=0.01) and time-to-recurrence (402 vs 498, 0.79, 0.70-0.90, p=0.0005), and significantly reduced distant metastases (324 vs 375, 0.86, 0.74-0.99, p=0.04) and contralateral breast cancers (35 vs 59, 42% reduction, 12-62, p=0.01). Almost all patients have completed their scheduled treatment, and fewer withdrawals occurred with anastrozole than with tamoxifen. Anastrozole was also associated with fewer side-effects than tamoxifen, especially gynaecological problems and vascular events, but arthralgia and fractures were increased. Anastrozole should be the preferred initial treatment for postmenopausal women with localised hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin during continuous hemofiltration with a new and a 24-h used highly permeable membrane: rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosage.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) is widely used in the management of critically ill patients, but only few administration guidelines for antimicrobial drugs are available. It is unclear whether the use of a filter for more than 24 hours might lead to less efficient extraction. This study describes the pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin during CVVH using a highly permeable membrane. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin during continuous hemofiltration with a new (group 1) and a 24-h used (group 2), highly permeable polyamide membrane were assessed in 3 patients. RESULTS: The teicoplanin serum concentrations (44.0 +/- 18.5 mg/l vs 109.5 +/- 34.5 mg/l) and half-life of teicoplanin (4.6 +/- 1.1 h vs 5.2 +/- 0.7 h) differed significantly between the 2 groups indicating a smaller elimination of the drug on the second day. Substantial binding of teicoplanin to filter membranes could explain this observation. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that daily adjustment of the dosage is necessary to achieve sufficient teicoplanin concentrations and a fixed dosage recommendation is not suitable for this drug.

Penetration of capecitabine and its metabolites into malignant and healthy tissues of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (FU). Since FU concentrations achieved in malignant lesions are an important determinant of efficacy, we investigated the intratumoral transcapillary transfer of capecitabine and its metabolites in vivo. A total of 10 patients with skin metastases from breast cancer received a daily dose of 2500 mg m(-2) capecitabine administered orally in two divided doses for 2 weeks. Microdialysis probes were inserted into a cutaneous metastasis and subcutaneous connective tissue to evaluate the interstitial tissue pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (DFCR), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (DFUR), and FU by capillary electrophoresis. As intended with the prodrug design of capecitabine, FU was present in low concentrations in tumour interstitium (median c(max): 0.26 microg ml(-1)) when compared with capecitabine, DFCR, and DFUR (median c(max): 2.66, 4.22, and 2.13 microg ml(-1), respectively). Capecitabine and its metabolites easily penetrated malignant and healthy tissue and equilibrated within 45 min between plasma and tissue interstitium. Considering tissue exposure at the extracellular level, no significant differences between healthy and malignant tissues were observed. Our data show that absorption and metabolism determined the tissue pharmacokinetics of capecitabine. There was no evidence of drug tolerance, which may be attributed to impaired transcapillary transfer into tissue, even after repeated administration as shown for three patients.

[Sepsis in hemato-oncologic patients]. / Sepsis bei hämato-onkologischen Patienten.

The general approach regarding the treatment of sepsis in patients with oncological or haematological malignancies does not differ significantly from that in immunocompetent individuals, however, there are several specialities. The main causes of severe infections in cancer patients include deranged cellular or humoral immunity due to the underlying disease, severe neutropenia as a consequence of cytostatic regimens, lesions of the mucosal barriers due to adverse effects of antineoplastic agents, and violations of the integument by therapeutic interventions. Due to the impaired host defense, life threatening infections can occur more often in these patients, thereby limiting the benefits of antineoplastic therapy. On this account precise and intensive therapy has to be initiated in the early stages of sepsis. In the following, we will not primarily focus on sepsis specific treatment modalities, but merely try to elucidate in more detail the pathomechanisms and special features with regard to infectious complications and specific treatment.

Pilot study with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

We performed a pilot-study on pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Seventeen patients received 40 mg/m(2) PLD intravenously every 4 weeks. A clinical benefit response was achieved in 50% (complete remission 7%, minor remission 7%, stable disease 36%). Toxicities were moderate. In view of these encouraging findings, further studies appear warranted.

The spectrum of vascular lesions in the mammary skin, including angiosarcoma, after breast conservation treatment for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the general acceptance of lumpectomy, axillary staging, and radiotherapy as local treatment for infiltrating breast cancer, an appreciation is evolving for the spectrum of vascular lesions that occur in the mammary skin after this treatment. Most of these lesions develop within the prior radiation field after breast conservation treatment. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart and slide review was conducted, consisting of five patients with cutaneous vascular lesions after breast conservation treatment for infiltrating breast cancer. RESULTS: The latent time interval from definitive treatment of breast cancer to the clinical recognition of vascular lesions ranged from 5 to 11 years. Two patients did not have either arm or breast edema, two patients had breast edema, and the fifth patient had arm edema. Lesions arising in the irradiated mammary skin included extensive lymphangiectasia (one), atypical vascular lesions (two), and cutaneous angiosarcoma (four). CONCLUSIONS: Atypical vascular lesions at the skin margins of mastectomy may be predictive of recurrence after resection of angiosarcoma. Excision of skin from the entire radiation field may be necessary to secure local control of the chest wall in patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma after therapeutic breast radiotherapy.

Sequential administration of interferon-gamma, GM-CSF, and interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results of a phase II trial.

Various cytokine combinations have been tested for efficacy in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (MRCC). Because several immunologic synergisms between granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating-factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have been demonstrated, this phase II trial was conducted on the efficacy and toxicity of subcutaneous, sequentially administered, interferon-gamma (IFNgamma), GM-CSF, and IL-2. Fifty-five consecutive patients with MRCC were treated with 100 microg recombinant IFNgamma1b administered thrice weekly during weeks 1 and 4, followed by 400 microg GM-CSF on 5 consecutive days during weeks 2 and 5. In weeks 3 and 6, patients received 4.5 MU recombinant IL-2 from days 1 to 4. The treatment was repeated every 8 weeks. Five (10%) of patients experienced an objective response (complete response [CR]: 2%, partial response [PR]: 8%). Fourteen (26%) patients had stable disease with a median duration of 19 months (6-47+). The median overall survival was 12 months (range: 0.3-44 months). No toxicity greater than World Health Organization grade II was observed, with fever (43%) and erythema (43%) being the most frequent side effects. Compared with other phase II trials with IFN-gamma and IL-2 alone, the addition of GM-CSF failed to improve response or survival in patients with MRCC.

Unexpected severe myelotoxicity of gemcitabine in pretreated breast cancer patients.

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent with proven antitumor effects in pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer; however, studies establishing the definite significance in other solid tumors are still in progress. We herein present three female patients with advanced breast cancer who received gemcitabine as salvage chemotherapy. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 was scheduled for days 1, 8 and 15 with a subsequent rest for 1 week. However, within 1 week after the very first administration of gemcitabine myelotoxicity WHO grade IV occurred in all patients, leading to discontinuation of therapy. In two patients this gemcitabine-induced hematotoxicity could be overcome by means of vigorous supportive care, but one patient died after cerebral bleeding due to severe thrombocytopenia. We conclude that gemcitabine in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients should only be used with extreme caution with special focus on platelet counts until solid data from clinical studies for doses and schedules are available.

2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 1997 clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast and colorectal cancers. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. OPTIONS: Six tumor markers for colorectal cancer and eight for breast cancer were considered. They could be recommended or not for routine use or for special circumstances. In addition to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 15-3, CA 27.29 was also considered among the serum tumor markers for breast cancer. OUTCOMES: In general, the significant health outcomes identified for use in making clinical practice guidelines (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used. EVIDENCE: A computerized literature search from 1994 to March 1999 was performed. VALUES: The same values for use, utility, and levels of evidence were used by the committee. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The same benefit, harms, and costs were used. RECOMMENDATION: Changes were recommended (see Appendix). VALIDATION: The updated recommendations were validated by external review by the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) Health Services Research Committee and by ASCO's Board of Directors. SPONSOR: American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Comparison of prone positioning and continuous rotation of patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome: results of a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare prone positioning and continuous rotational therapy with respect to oxygenation and hemodynamics in patients suffering from adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). DESIGN: Randomized, prospective pilot study. SETTING: Intensive care unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS from nontraumatic causes. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve patients were turned prone (group 1), 14 patients underwent continuous axial rotation from one lateral position to the other with a maximum angle of 124 degrees in specially designed beds (group 2). All patients had received inhaled nitric oxide (NO) therapy before positioning. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gas exchange and hemodynamics were assessed using a pulmonary artery catheter. In both groups, an improvement in PaO2/RFIO2-ratio and intrapulmonary shunt fraction occurred after initiation of NO as well as during the first 72 hrs of positioning therapy. During the study period, seven patients died in group 1 and nine patients in group 2 (p = NS). Comparing the areas under the curve during the first 72 hrs, no significant differences with respect to PaO2/FIO2-ratio, PaCO2, positive end-expiratory and peak inspiratory pressure levels, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, the alveolar-arterial oxygen difference, and oxygen delivery and consumption, as well as cardiac index, pulmonary and arterial blood pressures, and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressure could be detected between the groups. Prone positioning was tolerated well, continuous rotational therapy had to be modified according to hemodynamic instability in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: In severe lung injury, continuous rotational therapy seems to exert effects comparable to prone positioning and could serve as alternative when prone positioning seems inadvisable.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration in critically ill patients.

The present study was performed to analyse the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) with a high-flux polyamide membrane. Twelve patients received 500 mg levofloxacin intravenously. The mean levofloxacin concentration peak was 1.9 +/- 1.0 mg/L. The elimination half-life, haemofiltration clearance and total removal were 8.3 +/- 2.6 h, 27.6 +/- 8.4 mL/min and 56 +/- 19%, respectively. Further multiple-dose studies are required to enable dosage recommendations to be made for patients receiving renal replacement therapy with CVVH.

Docetaxel monotherapy in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, community-based feasibility trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel in heavily pretreated and anthracycline-resistant patients with metastatic breast cancer in an outpatient setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 1996 and June 1998, 98 consecutive patients who had progressed during or relapsed following prior anthracycline-containing chemotherapy were enrolled into the trial. Docetaxel was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. The administration of colony-stimulating factors was at the discretion of the attending physician. Premedication with dexamethasone was mandatory for all patients. RESULTS: Of the 98 patients, 93 were evaluable for toxicity and response. Patients had received two palliative regimens (median, range 1-5) prior to docetaxel treatment. The most frequent toxicity observed was leukopenia grade III and IV (WHO grading system) which occurred in 47% of patients (grade IV only in 14%). Except for alopecia grade III (64% of patients), nonhematologic side effects grade III-IV were rare (1-7% of patients) and included nausea, stomatitis, diarrhea, peripheral neuropathy, fluid retention and pulmonary toxicities. There were no treatment-related deaths. Objective responses occurred in 40% of patients (CR 6%, PR 34%), and stable disease in 38% of patients. The median duration of response was 5.3 months (range 0.7-18.1 months) while the median survival was 15 months (range 2 36 months). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is a highly active agent in patients with anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer, even in heavily pretreated patients, with moderate toxicity.

The efficacy of chemoradiation therapy in HIV seropositive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the efficacy of chemoradiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal in HIV seropositive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anus treated primarily with combined chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and mitomycin) and radiotherapy or local excision was undertaken comparing HIV seropositive to HIV seronegative patients. RESULTS: Thirteen HIV seronegative patients were compared with 6 HIV seropositive patients. The HIV positive group included a higher proportion of males and a significantly greater history of prior treatment for condyloma. There was no difference in the median radiation dose (5020 cGy vs 4500 cGy, P=0.10). There was a trend towards higher local tumour recurrence in the HIV seropositive patients although this was not statistically significant (30% vs 66%). The CD4 count of HIV positive patients did not correlate either with their ability to complete the prescribed treatment regimen or with subsequent recurrence. CONCLUSION: Combined chemoradiation is feasible in HIV positive patients, however, local recurrence rates in HIV positive patients may be higher. Tolerance of this therapy in HIV seropositive patients or recurrence after therapy are not related to the patient's CD4 cell count.